|
Harry Potter vs. Lord of the Flies
Deconstructing the Hidden Cultural Costs
of the Most Popular Children’s Fantasy
The
popularity of Harry Potter is
nothing
short of stupefying. Nielsen BookScan reports that the sixth in the
series, The Half-Blood Prince
(2005), was the
fastest selling book ever. Many retailers reported that The
Half-Blood Prince sold more copies the day of its release
than The Da Vinci Code sold the
entire year.
Global sales reached over 10 million within the first 24 hours
(Weinberg,
2005). These numbers have now been exceeded by sales figures for the
last volume in the series, The
Deathly Hallows. The entire series has sold over 350
million books worldwide making
Rowling the first author to earn over a billion dollars in book
royalties
(Watson and Kellner, 2004). When adding the success of the films and
DVDs to
the book sales, the Potter phenomenon is truly
staggering—both as a money-making
and myth-making engine. Rowling now has a net worth considerably
greater than the Queen of England, Elizabeth II.
Beloved
by millions, Rowling’s Potter creation has nevertheless drawn
critical fire
from some quarters. The criticism has come primarily from two
directions, the
Christian right and the scholarly left—the former disturbed
about the possible
promotion of magic, witchcraft, and Satanism (e.g., McGee and
Matrisciana,
2001; Kuby, 2003) and the latter unhappy with what has been argued to
be
Rowling’s pedestrian style. Aside from being peppered with an
abundance of
rhetorical clichés and stereotyped characters, the scholarly
left finds the
Potter series to be a narrative that, while appearing to do otherwise,
accomplishes
little toward liberation from gender and class prejudices and
traditional
hierarchies of authority (e.g., Bloom, 2000; Yeo, 2004; Mendlesohn,
2004). This
analysis will take a different critical approach, arguing that through
the structuring
of its primary dramatic conflicts Harry
Potter encourages readers and viewers to adopt narrowly
reductive ways of
assessing and engaging conflict while also endorsing deadly violence as
the
necessary recourse for disposing with what has been identified as
“evil” in the
world. These reductive ways of structuring conflict reinforce modes of
moral
evaluation along traditional hierarchical lines of radical polarization
between
good and evil. This way of structuring and portraying conflict
continues to be
an unhealthy, if not deadly, predisposition in the increasingly complex
climate
of a postmodern global village of inclusiveness mixed with difference,
division, and discord.
Since
there may be some—a handful, it would seem, based on the
volume of book and
ticket sales—who have not read a Potter book or viewed a
Potter film,
revisiting the events that drive the core narrative of the series may
prove
helpful for purposes of reader orientation and for directing attention
toward
points crucial to this inquiry.
Murdered
parents, a half-human wizard assassin at large, and Harry his primary
target!
Perhaps as dark, violent, and ominous a beginning for a book designed
as
“children’s literature” as one could hope
to find. And yet adolescents and
even adults are eating it up like carnival candy. When repeated endlessly in
various
retellings and media formats, the formative cultural influence of this
series
should not be underestimated. The potential effects of
“children’s literature”
may extend well beyond childhood. Speaking of C. S. Lewis’
work, one
commentator on children’s literature, Dan McVeigh, notes that
for Lewis “no
literature was worth reading as a child that was not just as worth
reading at
age fifty. Surely the ultimate appeal of children's literature . . . is
that it
addresses the fundamental questions of the child gazing up, like Dante,
at the
stars. Who am I? Why am I? Where am I going? In what story line do I
live?” (p.
8).
Many
adults will claim, along with Lewis, that their childhood literature is
in some
sense still worth reading and has had a seminal influence in shaping
character,
ambitions, and the particular quality of life they strive to lead. To
the
extent this assessment of childhood literature is true, it behooves
every adult
to constantly re-examine the literature presented to children and
adolescents.
This point will be touched on again at the conclusion, but now, given
the
amazing success of the Harry Potter
series, one question in particular looms large: Why do these stories
resonate
in such a popular way for a broad spectrum of the public?
The complete text can be purchased via credit card or PayPal for $1.34 here.
Topics addressed:
analysis commentary review of harry potter books and films
comparisons between harry potter books and films
violence in harry potter
the onset of puberty and harry potter
dramatic structure plot structure and genre in harry potter
is there a christian influence in harry potter
dan mcveigh on harry potter
morality and moral conflict in harry potter
harry potter criticism and critique
harry potter and media violence
the question of good and evil in harry potter
abuse of power in harry potter
life and death conflict in harry potter
prose style of harry potter
the horror genre and harry potter
melodrama and harry potter
sport competition and harry potter
love and harry potter
conflict management and harry potter
satanic themes and harry potter
symbolism in harry potter
harry potter and media violence
audience effects of violence in harry potter
popular appeal of harry potter
harry potter similarities with lord of the rings
harry potter in contrast with lord of the flies
References
Barthes, R.
(1957, 1972). Mythologies. Trans.
Annette Lavers. New York: Hill
and Wang.
Bloom, H.
(2000, July 11). Can 35
million book buyers be wrong? Yes. The
Wall Street Journal. (Retrieved January 17, 2007 from http://wrtbrooke.syr.edu/courses/205.03/bloom.html).
Bonta, S.
(2000, August 28).
Harry Potter’s Hocus-Pocus. The New
American, Vol 18, #2, 1-2. (Retrieved Jan 15, 2007 from
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2000/08-28-2000/vo16no18_potter.htm).
Bonta, S.
(2002, January 28).
Rings runs circles around Rowling: Christian in its worldview,
Tolkien's Lord of the Rings is a
literary masterpiece
far superior to Rowling's occult-laden, morally ambiguous Harry Potter series. The
New
American, Vol. 18, #2. (Retrieved
January 5, 2007 from Questia Media America, Inc. database
http://www.questia.com/).
CBBC
Newsround. (2003, January
21). Interview with J. K. Rowling and Steve Kloves. Childrens'
British
Broadcasting Company. Video retrieved January 19,
2007 from The
Leaky Cauldron Harry Potter Video Galleries web site:
http://www.the-leaky-cauldron.org/videogallery/video/show/164.
Desilet, G. (2002). Cult of the kill: Traditional metaphysics of
rhetoric, truth, and
violence in a postmodern world. Philadelphia:
Random House Ventures/Xlibris Corporation.
Desilet, G.
(2005). Our faith in evil: Melodrama and the
effects
of entertainment violence.
Jefferson, North Carolina:
McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers.
Dickerson,
M. and O’Hara, D.
(2006). From Homer to Harry Potter: A
handbook on myth and fantasy. Grand
Rapids: Brazos
Press.
Eco, U.
(1964, 1989). The
structure of bad taste. In The Open Work.
Trans. A. Cancogni. London:
Hutchinson
Radius.
Fox,
R. (1980). The red lamp of incest. New York:
Dutton.
Frankfurter,
D. (2006). Evil incarnate: Rumors of demonic
conspiracy
and satanic abuse in history. Princeton: Princeton
University
Press.
Freud, S.
(1905, 1955). The
transformations of puberty. In Vol. 7 of The
Complete Works of Sigmund Freud. Ed. James Strachey. London:
The Hogarth Press.
Freud, S.
(1912, 1955). On the
universal tendency to debasement in the sphere of love. In Vol. 11 of The Complete Works of Sigmund Freud. Ed.
James Strachey. London:
The Hogarth Press.
Freud, S.
(1913). Totem and
taboo: some points of agreement between the mental lives of savages and
neurotics. Trans. James Strachey. New York: W.
W. Norton.
Freud, S.
(1919, 1955). The
uncanny. In Vol. 17 of The Complete Works
of Sigmund Freud. Ed. James Strachey. London:
The Hogarth Press.
Golding,
W. (1954). Lord of the flies. New York:
Capricorn
Books.
Granger,
J. (2006). Looking for God in Harry
Potter. New York:
Saltriver.
Hard, A.
(2005, July 15). Harry
Potter turns to the dark side. Fox News.
(Retrieved December 27, 2006 from
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,162562,00.html).
Kern, E.
M., (2003). The wisdom of Harry Potter: What
our
favorite hero teaches us about moral choices. New York:
Prometheus Books.
Killinger,
J. (2002). God, the devil, and Harry Potter:
A Christian
minister’s defense of the beloved novels. New York:
Thomas Dunne Books.
Kuby, G.
(2003). Harry Potter—Good or Evil?
Taschenbuch:
fe-medienverlag Kisslegg. (Not available in English translation; for
Kuby’s web
site see http://www.gabriele-kuby.de/harry_potter.html).
Marcuse, H.
(1964). One dimensional man: Studies in the
ideology
of advanced industrial society. Boston:
Beacon Press.
McGee, R.
S. and Matrisciana, C.
(2001). Harry Potter: Witchcraft
repackaged—making evil look innocent. Hemet,
CA:
Jeremiah Films. (For further
information see www.theharrypottervideo.com).
McLuhan,
M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy. Toronto: University of Toronto
Press.
McLuhan, M.
(1964). Understanding media: The extensions
of man. New
York:
McGraw-Hill Book Company.
McLuhan, M.
and Fiore, Q. (1967). The Medium is the
massage: An
inventory
of effects. New York:
Bantam Books.
McLuhan, M.
and Fiore, Q. (1968). War and peace in the
global village. New
York: Bantam Books.
Mcveigh, D.
(2002). Is Harry
Potter Christian? Renascence: Essays on
Values in Literature, Vol. 54, #3, 1-10. Retrieved January 5,
2007 from
Questia Media America, Inc. database http://www.questia.com/.
Mendlesohn,
F. (2004). Crowning
the king: Harry Potter and the construction of authority. In L. A.
Whited
(Ed.), The Ivory Tower and Harry Potter
(pp. 159-181). Columbia,
MO: University
of Missouri
Press.
Nathan, I.
(2005, October 27). Potter turns to the dark side. The
London
Evening Standard. Retrieved December 28, 2006 from
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/film/article-20759263-details/Potter+turns+to+the+dark+side/article
Neal, C.
(2002). The gospel according to Harry Potter:
spirituality in the stories of the world’s most famous seeker.
New York:
Westminster
John Knox Press
Paden, W.
E. (1988). Religious worlds: The comparative
study of religion. Boston:
Beacon
Press.
Pauli, M.
(2006, August 2).
Authors beg Rowling: don’t kill Harry. Guardian
Unlimited. Retrieved January 5, 2007 from
http://books.guardian.co.uk/harrypotter/story
/0,,1835583,00.html.
Postman,
N. (1982). The Disappearance of Childhood.
New
York:
Delacorte Press.
Postman,
N. (1985). Amusing Ourselves to Death.
New
York:
Viking Penguin, Inc.
Rowling, J.
K. (1997). Harry Potter and the
sorcerer’s stone. New York:
Arthur A.
Levine Books.
Rowling, J.
K. (1999a). Harry Potter and the chamber of
secrets. New
York:
Arthur A. Levine Books.
Rowling, J.
K. (1999b). Harry Potter and the prisoner of
Azkaban. New
York:
Arthur A. Levine Books.
Rowling, J.
K. (2000). Harry Potter and the goblet of fire.
New
York: Arthur A.
Levine Books.
Rowling, J.
K. (2003). Harry Potter and the order of the
phoenix. New
York:
Arthur A. Levine Books.
Rowling, J.
K. (2005). Harry Potter and the half-blood
prince. New York:
Arthur A.
Levine Books.
Rowling, J.
K. (2007). Harry Potter and the deathly
hallows. New York:
Arthur A.
Levine Books.
Shelley, M.
W. (1831). Frankenstein. Retrieved
January 17, 2007
from Electronic
Text
Center,
University of Virginia Library
web site: http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/SheFran.html
Stevenson,
R. L. (1886, 1991). The Strange Case of Dr.
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. New
York:
Vintage Books.
Tolkien, J.
R. R. (1986). The hobbit and the lord of the
rings. New York: Del
Rey
Publishers.
Twitchell,
J. (1985). Dreadful pleasures: An anatomy of
modern
horror. New York:
Oxford
Univeristy Press.
Watson J.
and Kellner, T. (2004,
February 26). J. K. Rowling and the billion-dollar empire. Forbes.
Retrieved January 19, 2007 from
http://www.forbes.com/maserati/
billionaires2004/cx_jw_0226rowlingbill04.html.
Weinberg,
A. (2005, July 21).
Nielsen BookScan releases Potter sales figures. The Book
Standard.
Retrieved January19, 2007 from http://www.thebookstandard.com
/bookstandard
/news/retail/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000989390.
Wolfe, T.
(1965). The kandy-kolored tangerine-flake
streamline
baby. New York:
Pocket Books.
Wolfe,
T. (1968a). The electric kool-aid acid
test. New York:
Bantam Books.
Wolfe,
T. (1968b). The pump house gang. New York:
Bantam Books.
Wolfe, T.
(1970). Radical chic and mau-mauing the flak
catchers. New York:
Bantam Books.
Wood, R.
(1996). Burying the
undead: The use and obsolescence of Count Dracula. In B. K. Grant
(Ed.), The dread of difference: Gender and
the
horror film (pp. 364-378). Austin: The University
of Texas
Press.
Yeo,
Michelle. (2004, February). Harry Potter and
the chamber of secrets:
Feminist interpretations/Jungian dreams. Studies
in media and information literacy education, Vol. 4, #1,
article 45.
(Retrieved January 14, 2007 from http://www.utpjournals.com/simile
/issue13/ yeofulltext.html).
.
Click on the
following link to preview works on Media Violence
Top
of Page ↑
Copyright © Gregory Desilet 2005
All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
Digital photography and website designed by
WebNet Solutions
|